Two Real-World Case Studies: A Discounted Payoff and a Profitable Note Sale

Why Case Studies Matter

Numbers on a data tape tell you what a loan looks like. Case studies tell you what a loan does. Every non-performing loan is a unique situation involving a real borrower, a real property, and a real set of circumstances that determine how the deal plays out.

The two case studies below walk through actual deals — one resolved through a discounted payoff and the other through a note sale on the secondary market. Together, they illustrate how different exit strategies produce returns and why understanding the borrower's situation is the most important variable in the equation.

---

Case Study 1: First-Lien Discounted Payoff on a Rural Property

The Loan Profile

This deal involved a non-performing loan in first position, secured by a single-family residence on a large rural parcel — over 30 acres with a horse barn.

The borrower owed $60,000 on a property worth roughly $40,000. That is negative equity — the debt exceeded the collateral value by approximately $22,000.

The Borrower's Story

Every resolution starts with three questions: What happened? Where are you now? What do you want to do?

These questions are not formalities. They frame the entire negotiation. A resolution built around a borrower's actual circumstances has far more longevity than one forced through a standard process.

Here is what the borrower shared:

• What happened: The borrower was no longer living in the property. It had fallen into disrepair.
• Where are you now: They had relocated to a more manageable property and attempted to sell the subject property multiple times, listing it at $50,000 starting in 2016 with no success.
• What do you want to do: They wanted to resolve the debt, but the numbers did not work. Investing in repairs to attract a buyer made no financial sense when the debt exceeded the property value.

The Complication: Environmental Risk

The rural acreage introduced a factor that does not appear on most data tapes — potential environmental liability. An EPA assessment alone can cost $30,000 or more, and actual remediation can run well into six figures.

For context: a similar deal in Oregon had documented EPA issues — a contaminated site with old tires and leaking farm equipment that caused heavy metal contamination in groundwater. The estimated mitigation cost was $150,000.

This is one of the advantages of being the lender rather than the property owner. As a senior lien holder, environmental liability sits primarily with the borrower and the property — not with the bank. But it also meant taking the property back through foreclosure was an unattractive option, making a negotiated payoff the preferred path.

The Negotiation

The negotiation lasted nearly a month:

1. Lender's opening offer: $46,200 — rejected by the borrower, since the property was worth less than that amount.
2. Borrower's counteroffer: $25,000.
3. Final agreement: $30,000 — the lender held firm at this number, and the borrower's attorney completed documentation to verify the lien release would be executed upon receipt of funds.

The Numbers

The ROI on this deal was approximately 50%. The internal rate of return depends on how quickly the resolution closes — a six-month resolution pushes the annualized return even higher because the same dollar return is compressed into a shorter holding period.

What Made This Deal Work

1. The purchase price reflected the risk. At roughly 50% of FMV and 33% of UPB, the entry point left room for a profitable exit even at a steep discount.
2. Environmental risk made foreclosure unattractive. The lender was more willing to negotiate a deep discount because the alternative — taking the property back as REO — carried significant downside.
3. The borrower was motivated. They had already tried to sell the property, relocated, and wanted closure. Motivation is the single biggest driver of discounted payoff resolutions.
4. The three-question framework shaped the offer. Instead of leading with a number, the lender understood the borrower's constraints first and structured a deal both sides could accept.

---

Case Study 2: Second-Lien Note Sale at 45 Cents on the Dollar

The Loan Profile

This deal involved a non-performing loan in second position, secured by a single-family residence in North Carolina.

Why This Loan Had Value

Not all non-performing loans are created equal. This one had three characteristics that made it attractive to buyers:

1. Significant equity. The FMV exceeded the senior lien by approximately $125,000. The junior lien balance of $112,540 fit comfortably within that equity cushion, meaning the borrower's total debt was still less than the property value.

2. Current senior lien. The borrower's credit report showed a perfect pay string on the first mortgage — twelve consecutive months of on-time payments. When a borrower is actively paying their first mortgage, it signals strong intent to keep the property. That intent makes them far more likely to negotiate a resolution on the second lien through a loan modification or discounted payoff.

3. Recent default. A last payment date of June 2018 meant this was a relatively fresh default, not a loan that had been sitting untouched for a decade. More recent defaults generally have higher resolution rates because the borrower is still engaged.

Why the Lender Sold Instead of Resolving

The lender — a company based in Philadelphia managing assets across multiple states — operated on a velocity model. If they could not generate borrower contact with minimal outreach effort, they preferred to sell the debt to an investor with closer geographic proximity and the capacity to pursue a more hands-on resolution.

This is a common dynamic in the secondary mortgage market. Large portfolio holders often sell off assets they do not have the bandwidth to work individually. That creates opportunity for smaller investors who specialize in specific geographies or resolution strategies.

The Sale Process

The loan was marketed through the FIXnotes platform:

• 20+ interested buyers reviewed the opportunity during a two-week negotiation and due diligence window.
• Winning bidders were given exclusive access to complete their review of the collateral file — the note, mortgage, assignments, and all supporting documentation.
• The buyer who acquired this loan also purchased two additional non-performing second liens, creating a package of three assets across North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Maryland.

The Pricing

The 45% price-to-UPB ratio for the North Carolina loan reflected its quality — high equity, current senior, and a strong property market. The third loan priced at 33% had less favorable characteristics.

For context, pricing on second-lien NPLs with current seniors and positive equity can range from 33% to 55%+ of UPB depending on the state, property value, and foreclosure timeline. North Carolina's stricter judicial foreclosure process pushed pricing slightly lower than what an equivalent loan in a non-judicial state on the West Coast might command.

---

How These Two Deals Compare

These two deals illustrate a fundamental truth about non-performing loan investing: there is no single playbook. The first deal required patience, borrower empathy, and willingness to accept a discount driven by environmental risk. The second deal was a straightforward capital allocation decision — the seller lacked the capacity to resolve the loan, so they sold it at a price that let the buyer capture the upside.

Key Takeaways

1. Pricing Drives Everything

Both of these deals worked because the entry price was right. In the first case, acquiring the loan at approximately $20,000 against a $30,000 payoff left a 50% return. In the second case, the buyer paid 45 cents on the dollar for a loan with a current senior and $125,000 of equity — a strong position for any resolution strategy.

As the industry saying goes: you make your money when you buy.

2. Borrower Context Determines the Resolution

The first-lien borrower had relocated, tried to sell, and wanted out. That context pointed directly to a discounted payoff. The second-lien borrower was paying their first mortgage on time every month — a signal that they intended to keep the property and would likely negotiate a resolution to protect their equity.

Understanding the borrower's situation through the three-question framework — What happened? Where are you now? What do you want to do? — is what separates investors who consistently close deals from those who push every loan through a rigid process.

3. Senior vs. Junior Liens Require Different Analysis

Senior liens are priced based on FMV because they are most often resolved through the property — either the borrower pays, or the lender takes back the collateral. Junior liens are priced based on UPB because they are most often resolved through the borrower — the borrower wants to keep their home and works out a deal.

This distinction affects everything: how you evaluate the deal, how you negotiate, and what return profile you can expect.

4. Not Every Deal Needs a Resolution to Be Profitable

The second case study was profitable for the seller without ever making borrower contact. Selling a performing asset — or in this case, a non-performing asset with strong fundamentals — is a legitimate exit strategy. The secondary market provides liquidity for investors who need to recycle capital or who lack the operational capacity to work individual loans.

5. Environmental and Property-Level Risks Are Real

The first case study is a reminder that due diligence goes beyond the financial data. A 30-acre rural parcel with potential contamination is a materially different asset than a suburban three-bedroom, even if the UPB is the same. For first-lien investors who may end up owning the property, environmental risk can turn a profitable deal into a liability.

---

The Bottom Line

These two case studies — a $30,000 discounted payoff on a rural first lien and a $50,000 note sale on a high-equity second lien — represent two of the most common exit strategies in non-performing loan investing. Neither deal was flashy. Neither involved extreme leverage or speculative bets. Both were grounded in sound acquisition pricing, thorough analysis of borrower and property fundamentals, and a practical approach to resolution.

That is what real-world note investing looks like: disciplined buying, patient execution, and meeting borrowers where they are.